vs
3.1Noise control & calls5.6
Why is Amiron 200 better than Method 540 ANC?
Amiron 200 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Method 540 ANC better than Amiron 200?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Amiron 200: Yes
- Total with charging case36 h vs 40 h+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | — | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 97 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 4 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 11 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 36 h | 40 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 10 min → 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 11 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Colours | — | Bone, Primer, True Black |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Beats Powerbeats Fitvsbeyerdynamic Amiron 2005.85.6vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer
vsbeyerdynamic AMIRON 300vsbeyerdynamic Amiron 2008.05.6vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsbeyerdynamic AMIRON 1005.66.3vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsEdifier A6vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsEdifier Comfo Flex