vs
3.0Noise control & calls3.0
7.9Battery8.7
Why is Amiron 200 better than OpenFit 2?
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 50 Hz2.5×
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 16,000 Hz+25%
Why is OpenFit 2 better than Amiron 200?
- Total with charging case36 h vs 48 h+33%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 50 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 16,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | — | 94 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 11 h | 11 h |
| Total with charging case | 36 h | 48 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 56 mAh |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 9.4 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 5 |
| Colours | — | Black, Beige |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK25.56.1
vsBeats Powerbeats Fitvsbeyerdynamic Amiron 2005.75.5
vsbeyerdynamic AMIRON 300vsbeyerdynamic Amiron 2007.95.5vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsEdifier A6vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsEdifier Comfo Flexvs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsbeyerdynamic AMIRON 1005.56.4