vs
3.0Noise control & calls7.2
7.9Battery7.7
Why is Amiron 200 better than LIVE Buds 4?
- Battery life11 h vs 10 h+10%
Why is LIVE Buds 4 better than Amiron 200?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Amiron 200: Yes
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · Amiron 200: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
- LDACNo · Amiron 200: Yes
- Bluetooth version5.3 vs 6+13%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 106 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 11 h | 10 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 8 h |
| Total with charging case | 36 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4.8 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsAudio Technica ATH-TWX9MK25.56.1
vsBeats Powerbeats Fitvsbeyerdynamic Amiron 2005.75.5
vsbeyerdynamic AMIRON 300vsbeyerdynamic Amiron 2007.95.5vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsEdifier A6vs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsEdifier Comfo Flexvs
beyerdynamic Amiron 200vsbeyerdynamic AMIRON 1005.56.4