vs
8.3Noise control & calls4.8
4.6Battery2.0
6.0Build & features5.0
Why is AMIRON 100 better than LinkBuds Fit?
- Battery life8 h vs 2 h4×
- Active noise cancellingYes · LinkBuds Fit: No
- Total with charging case27 h vs 21 h+29%
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- Charging time2 h vs 4 h2×
- Earbud weight (each)4.2 g vs 4.9 g+18%
Why is LinkBuds Fit better than AMIRON 100?
LinkBuds Fit has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 8.4 mm |
| Number of drivers | — | 4 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 21 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 95 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | 6 | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 2 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 5 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 27 h | 21 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 4 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 15 min → 3 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.2 g | 4.9 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
