Why is SoundForm Mini 2 AUD012fq better than TUNE 530BT?
- Driver size40 mm vs 33 mm+21%
Why is TUNE 530BT better than SoundForm Mini 2 AUD012fq?
- Battery life55 h vs 76 h+38%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 33 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 30 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 102 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 55 h | 76 h |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 152 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips TAK4200vsBelkin SoundForm Mini 2 AUD012fq
vs
Moondrop Space Travel 2vsBelkin SoundForm Mini 2 AUD012fq
vs
Philips THE RINGO DUOvsBelkin SoundForm Mini 2 AUD012fq
vs
Belkin SoundForm Mini 2 AUD012fqvsPhilips TAH4500
vs
Belkin SoundForm Mini 2 AUD012fqvsEarFun Wave Pro X
vs
JBL Tune 730BTvsJBL TUNE 530BT
