vs
3.0Noise control & calls9.3
Why is Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK better than TAT2139?
- Battery capacity90 mAh vs 50 mAh+80%
Why is TAT2139 better than Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver size | — | 13 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 94 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 28 h |
| Battery capacity | 90 mAh | 50 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Huawei FreeBuds SE 3vsBelkin Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK
vs
Belkin Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBKvsFresh 'n Rebel Twins Breez
vs
Baseus Bass EP10 ProvsBelkin Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK
vs
Belkin Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBKvsOPPO Enco Buds3
vs
Belkin Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBKvsMotorola Moto Buds Bass
vs
CG Mobile Guess Wireless Earbuds ENCvsBelkin Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK

