How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK vs TAT2139

Belkin Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK vs Philips TAT2139

What Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK does better (1) and where TAT2139 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Belkin Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK
1 advantage≈ $25
vs
Philips TAT2139
Philips · 2024TAT2139
6.7Score
1 advantage≈ $25
Higher score
3.0Noise control & calls9.3

Why is Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK better than TAT2139?

  1. Battery capacity90 mAh vs 50 mAh+80%

Why is TAT2139 better than Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Activefit Sports In-Ear schwarz AUC016hqBK: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT2139Philips TAT2139≈ $256.7
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver size—13 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—94 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Battery & charging
Battery life—7 h
Total with charging case—28 h
Battery capacity90 mAh50 mAh
Charging time—2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45.3
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Protection ratingIP54IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare