Why is HC 200 better than Tune 520C?
- Driver size57 mm vs 33 mm+73%
Why is Tune 520C better than HC 200?
Tune 520C has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | On-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 57 mm | 33 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 30 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 102 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 157 g |
| Foldable | — | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
