How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Solo Buds vs Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK

Beats Solo Buds vs Philips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK

What Solo Buds does better (0) and where Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Beats Solo Buds
Beats · 2024Solo Buds
8.9Score
0 advantages≈ $65
Higher score
vs
Philips Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK
0 advantages≈ $60
9.3Noise control & calls9.3

Why is Solo Buds better than Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK?

Solo Buds has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK better than Solo Buds?

Wireless Earphones TAT6000BK has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Beats Solo BudsBeats Solo Buds≈ $658.9
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life18 h—
Total with charging case18 h—
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
USB-CYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)5.7 g—
Protection rating—IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare