vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
4.8Battery3.7
Why is Powerbeats Fit better than Osprey?
Powerbeats Fit has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Osprey better than Powerbeats Fit?
Osprey has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Hybrid |
| Driver size | — | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 10 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 40,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 104 dB |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Head tracking | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 7 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 5 h |
| Total with charging case | 30 h | — |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 5 min → 1 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | — | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Siri | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.8 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Beats Powerbeats Fitvsbeyerdynamic Amiron 2005.85.6vs
Beats Powerbeats FitvsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörervs
Beats Powerbeats FitvsEdifier Comfo Flexvs
Beats Powerbeats FitvsEdifier A6
vs
Sennheiser Accentum ClipvsNoble Audio Osprey5.85.9vsNoble Audio OspreyvsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer