How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Fit Pro vs AMIRON 100

Beats Fit Pro vs beyerdynamic AMIRON 100

What Fit Pro does better (1) and where AMIRON 100 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Beats Fit Pro
Beats · 2022Fit Pro
6.2Score
1 advantage≈ $140
vs
beyerdynamic AMIRON 100
beyerdynamic · 2024AMIRON 100
6.3Score
2 advantages≈ $130
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls8.3
4.2Battery4.6

Why is Fit Pro better than AMIRON 100?

  1. Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×

Why is AMIRON 100 better than Fit Pro?

  1. Battery life6 h vs 8 h+33%
  2. Total with charging case24 h vs 27 h+12%
Specifications

Side by side

Beats Fit ProBeats Fit Pro≈ $1406.2
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—40,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—95 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Head trackingYes—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—6
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life6 h8 h
Battery life with ANC—5 h
Total with charging case24 h27 h
Charging time1 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—15 min → 3 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.3
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—4.2 g
Protection ratingIPX4IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)—5
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare