How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Inspire XC1 vs Tune 255NC

Baseus Inspire XC1 vs JBL Tune 255NC

What Inspire XC1 does better (6) and where Tune 255NC wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Baseus Inspire XC1
Baseus · 2025Inspire XC1
7.9Score
6 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
vs
JBL Tune 255NC
JBL · 2025Tune 255NC
7.9Score
4 advantages≈ $75
4.6Noise control & calls5.7
6.9Battery9.3
9.0Build & features3.5

Why is Inspire XC1 better than Tune 255NC?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
  2. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  3. Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
  4. Bluetooth version6.1 vs 5.3+15%
  5. Dust protection (IP)6 vs 5+20%
  6. Driver size10.8 mm vs 10 mm+8%

Why is Tune 255NC better than Inspire XC1?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Inspire XC1: Yes
  2. Battery life8 h vs 12 h+50%
  3. Total with charging case40 h vs 48 h+20%
  4. Battery capacity48 mAh vs 65 mAh+35%
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Tune 255NCJBL Tune 255NC≈ $757.9
Sound
FitOpen-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size10.8 mm10 mm
Number of drivers2—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—100 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h12 h
Battery life with ANC—12 h
Total with charging case40 h48 h
Battery capacity48 mAh65 mAh
Charging time1 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version6.15.3
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Weight—52 g
Earbud weight (each)6 g—
Protection ratingIP66IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx6IPx4
Dust protection (IP)65
Colours—Black
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare