How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Inspire XC1 vs AH-C840NCW

Baseus Inspire XC1 vs Denon AH-C840NCW

What Inspire XC1 does better (5) and where AH-C840NCW wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Baseus Inspire XC1
Baseus · 2025Inspire XC1
7.8Score
5 advantages≈ $110
Higher score
vs
Denon AH-C840NCW
Denon · 2025AH-C840NCW
7.2Score
4 advantages≈ $110
4.4Noise control & calls7.2
6.6Battery7.1
9.0Build & features4.8

Why is Inspire XC1 better than AH-C840NCW?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · AH-C840NCW: No
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx4+50%
  3. Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
  4. LDACYes · AH-C840NCW: No
  5. Bluetooth version6.1 vs 5.3+15%

Why is AH-C840NCW better than Inspire XC1?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Inspire XC1: Yes
  2. Battery life8 h vs 10 h+25%
  3. Earbud weight (each)6 g vs 5 g+20%
  4. Driver size10.8 mm vs 12 mm+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Denon AH-C840NCWDenon AH-C840NCW≈ $1107.2
Sound
FitOpen-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10.8 mm12 mm
Number of drivers2—
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency40,000 Hz—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones4—
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h10 h
Battery life with ANC—7 h
Total with charging case40 h—
Battery capacity48 mAh—
Charging time1 h2 h
Wireless charging (case)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version6.15.3
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCLC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game modeYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)6 g5 g
Protection ratingIP66IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx6IPx4
Dust protection (IP)6—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare