How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Bowie MC2 vs TAMS3

Baseus Bowie MC2 vs Philips TAMS3

What Bowie MC2 does better (7) and where TAMS3 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Baseus Bowie MC2
Baseus · 2026Bowie MC2
7 advantages≈ $80
vs
Philips TAMS3
Philips · 2026TAMS3
7.5Score
0 advantages≈ $75
Higher score

Why is Bowie MC2 better than TAMS3?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · TAMS3: No
  2. Battery life11.5 h vs 10 h+15%
  3. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
  4. Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
  5. LDACYes · TAMS3: No
  6. Dust protection (IP)6 vs 5+20%
  7. Driver size11 mm vs 10 mm+10%

Why is TAMS3 better than Bowie MC2?

TAMS3 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAMS3Philips TAMS3≈ $757.5
Sound
FitOpen-earIn-ear
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size11 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency40,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—106 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones—6
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life11.5 h10 h
Battery life with ANC—7 h
Total with charging case—42 h
Battery capacity—60 mAh
Quick charge (claimed)—15 min → 3 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version66
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCLC3, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—2.5 g
Protection ratingIP67IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx4
Dust protection (IP)65
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare