vs
9.2Noise control & calls5.1
9.6Battery9.4
Why is Bowie H1i better than CMF Buds 2?
- Battery life100 h vs 13 h7.7×
- Battery life with ANC70 h vs 32 h2.2×
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · CMF Buds 2: No
- Battery capacity600 mAh vs 53 mAh11.3×
Why is CMF Buds 2 better than Bowie H1i?
CMF Buds 2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 11 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | — |
| Sensitivity | — | 48 dB |
| Spatial / 3D audio | — | Yes |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 100 h | 13 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 70 h | 32 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 55 h |
| Battery capacity | 600 mAh | 53 mAh |
| Charging time | — | 1.5 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LHDC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 4.5 g |
| Protection rating | — | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
