How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Bass BH1 NC Wireless ANC vs TAK4200

Baseus Bass BH1 NC Wireless ANC vs Philips TAK4200

What Bass BH1 NC Wireless ANC does better (4) and where TAK4200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Baseus Bass BH1 NC Wireless ANC
4 advantages≈ $30
vs
Philips TAK4200
Philips · 2026TAK4200
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ $35
Higher score
9.2Noise control & calls5.5

Why is Bass BH1 NC Wireless ANC better than TAK4200?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAK4200: No
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · TAK4200: No
  3. LDACYes · TAK4200: No
  4. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%

Why is TAK4200 better than Bass BH1 NC Wireless ANC?

  1. Battery capacity80 mAh vs 300 mAh3.8×
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAK4200Philips TAK4200≈ $354.5
Sound
FitIn-earOn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—32 mm
Number of drivers—1
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity80 dB85 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—45 h
Battery capacity80 mAh300 mAh
Charging time—2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.4
Bluetooth codecsLDACSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight—129 g
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare