vs
8.6Noise control & calls7.2
2.3Battery5.6
Why is Cisco 950 better than Svanar Wireless 2?
Cisco 950 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Svanar Wireless 2 better than Cisco 950?
- Battery life5 h vs 8 h+60%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 6+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Lowest frequency | — | 10 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 35,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 8 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 5 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 7.4 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
