How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Cisco 950 vs TWS STAX S10 ANC planar

Bang & Olufsen Cisco 950 vs Edifier TWS STAX S10 ANC planar

What Cisco 950 does better (0) and where TWS STAX S10 ANC planar wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Bang & Olufsen Cisco 950
Bang & Olufsen · 2025Cisco 950
4.9Score
0 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
vs
Edifier TWS STAX S10 ANC planar
2 advantages≈ $290
8.6Noise control & calls9.3

Why is Cisco 950 better than TWS STAX S10 ANC planar?

Cisco 950 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TWS STAX S10 ANC planar better than Cisco 950?

  1. Battery life with ANC5 h vs 18 h3.6×
  2. Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicPlanar magnetic
Driver size—12 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—40,000 Hz
Sensitivity—92 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Noise reduction for callsYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life5 h—
Battery life with ANC5 h18 h
Charging time—1.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.4
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, LHDC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-C—Yes
Design & build
Protection ratingIP54IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)55
ColoursBlackBlack
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare