vs
8.6Noise control & calls5.6
2.3Battery3.8
Why is Cisco 950 better than QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)?
- Battery life with ANC5 h vs 4 h+25%
Why is QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) better than Cisco 950?
- Battery life5 h vs 6 h+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Spatial / 3D audio | — | Yes |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 4 |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 6 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 5 h | 4 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 24 h |
| Charging time | — | 1 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 10 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)vsHuawei FreeBuds Pro 54.89.3vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörervs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)vsSoundcore P30i4.88.4vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)vsBose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds4.85.6vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)vsBose Ultra Open Earbuds4.84.7vs
Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen)vsSoundcore Sport X204.89.3