How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. BeoSound A5 vs R3S

Bang & Olufsen BeoSound A5 vs Ruark R3S

What BeoSound A5 does better (4) and where R3S wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Bang & Olufsen BeoSound A5
Bang & Olufsen · 2023BeoSound A5
5.7Score
4 advantages≈ $1,500
Higher score
vs
Ruark R3S
Ruark · 2023R3S
4.7Score
0 advantages≈ $950
8.5Sound3.5
6.4Connectivity6.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

BeoSound A5R3S
285 × 187130420 × 167220
BeoSound A5R3SDifference
Height187 mm167 mm+20 mm
Width285 mm420 mm−135 mm
Depth130 mm220 mm−90 mm
Weight3,700 g5,300 g−1,600 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is BeoSound A5 better than R3S?

  1. Output power280 W vs 30 W9.3×
  2. Weight3,700 g vs 5,300 g+43%
  3. Lowest frequency32 Hz vs 40 Hz+25%
  4. Highest frequency23,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+15%

Why is R3S better than BeoSound A5?

R3S has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Ruark R3SRuark R3S≈ $9504.7
Sound
Output power280 W30 W
Lowest frequency32 Hz40 Hz
Highest frequency23,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life12 h—
Battery capacity9,000 mAh—
Charging time3 h—
Mains poweredNoYes
Battery powered (portable)YesNo
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.2
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Optical input—Yes
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
AirPlayYes—
Chromecast / Google CastYes—
Spotify ConnectYesYes
MultiroomYes—
Voice assistant built in—Yes
Companion appYesYes
Design & build
Weight3,700 g5,300 g
Width285 mm420 mm
Height187 mm167 mm
Depth130 mm220 mm
Protection ratingIP65—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5—
Dust protection (IP)6—
Features
Party / stereo pairingYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare