vs
Why is Beosound A1 (3rd Gen) better than Aura Studio 5?
Beosound A1 (3rd Gen) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Aura Studio 5 better than Beosound A1 (3rd Gen)?
- Output power60 W vs 160 W2.7×
- Bluetooth version5.1 vs 5.4+6%
- Lowest frequency54 Hz vs 45 Hz+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | 60 W | 160 W |
| Speaker channels | 1.0 | — |
| Channel count | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 54 Hz | 45 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Stereo | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 24 h | — |
| Charging time | 3 h | — |
| Mains powered | No | Yes |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| USB audio | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 576 g | — |
| Width | 133 mm | 234 mm |
| Height | 46 mm | 306 mm |
| Depth | 133 mm | 234 mm |
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 6 | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
| Party / stereo pairing | Yes | Yes |
| Light effects | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Bang & Olufsen Beosound A1 (3rd Gen)vsOnkyo GX-30ARCvs
Bang & Olufsen Beosound A1 (3rd Gen)vsSoundcore Rave 3S A31A3012vs
Bang & Olufsen Beosound A1 (3rd Gen)vsEdifier ED-S3008.88.9vs
Bang & Olufsen Beosound A1 (3rd Gen)vsEdifier ES300
vs
JBL Xtreme 5vsHarman-Kardon Aura Studio 5vsHarman-Kardon Aura Studio 5vsOnkyo GX-30ARC