How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. BeoPlay H95 vs 109 Pro

Bang & Olufsen BeoPlay H95 vs Meze 109 Pro

What BeoPlay H95 does better (2) and where 109 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Bang & Olufsen BeoPlay H95
Bang & Olufsen · 2020BeoPlay H95
5.4Score
2 advantages≈ $920
Higher score
vs
Meze 109 Pro
Meze · 2022109 Pro
3 advantages≈ $840
5.8Noise control & calls3.8

Why is BeoPlay H95 better than 109 Pro?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · 109 Pro: No
  2. Weight323 g vs 375 g+16%

Why is 109 Pro better than BeoPlay H95?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
  2. Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 30,000 Hz+36%
  3. Driver size40 mm vs 50 mm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Meze 109 ProMeze 109 Pro≈ $840
Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size40 mm50 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency20 Hz5 Hz
Highest frequency22,000 Hz30,000 Hz
Impedance12 Ω40 Ω
Sensitivity102 dB112 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones2—
Battery & charging
Battery life50 h—
Battery life with ANC38 h—
Battery capacity1,110 mAh—
Charging time2 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
Bluetooth version5.1—
Bluetooth codecsaptX, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXYes—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight323 g375 g
Protection ratingIP53—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx3—
Dust protection (IP)5—
FoldableYes—
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare