vs
6.2Noise control & calls4.0
Why is BeoPlay H95 better than Mini Shangri-La?
- Active noise cancellingYes · Mini Shangri-La: No
Why is Mini Shangri-La better than BeoPlay H95?
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 7 Hz2.9×
- Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 90,000 Hz4.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Planar magnetic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | — |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 7 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 22,000 Hz | 90,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 12 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 50 h | — |
| Battery life with ANC | 38 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 1,110 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 323 g | 320 g |
| Protection rating | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Colours | — | Black, Silver |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
