vs
5.8Noise control & calls7.8
Why is BeoPlay H95 better than Px8 S2 McLaren?
- Battery life50 h vs 30 h+67%
Why is Px8 S2 McLaren better than BeoPlay H95?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · BeoPlay H95: Yes
- Weight323 g vs 310 g+4%
- Bluetooth version5.1 vs 5.3+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Over-ear | — |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 22,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 12 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | 2 | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 50 h | 30 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 38 h | — |
| Battery capacity | 1,110 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | aptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 323 g | 310 g |
| Protection rating | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Bang & Olufsen BeoPlay H95vsMeze 109 Provs
Bang & Olufsen BeoPlay H95vsAudio Technica ATH-WP900vs
Bang & Olufsen BeoPlay H95vsbeyerdynamic T5 (3rd Gen)vs
Bang & Olufsen BeoPlay H95vsFocal Clear MG Professional
vs
Focal Bathys MGvsBowers & Wilkins Px8 S2 McLaren
vsHifiMan Arya OrganicvsBowers & Wilkins Px8 S2 McLaren