How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Beocom EX UC vs EAH-AZ80

Bang & Olufsen Beocom EX UC vs Technics EAH-AZ80

What Beocom EX UC does better (5) and where EAH-AZ80 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Bang & Olufsen Beocom EX UC
Bang & Olufsen · 2023Beocom EX UC
7.1Score
5 advantages≈ $230
Higher score
vs
Technics EAH-AZ80
Technics · 2023EAH-AZ80
4.9Score
2 advantages≈ $200
7.2Noise control & calls4.8
5.3Battery3.9

Why is Beocom EX UC better than EAH-AZ80?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · EAH-AZ80: No
  2. Battery life8 h vs 7 h+14%
  3. Charging time1.5 h vs 7 h4.7×
  4. aptXYes · EAH-AZ80: No
  5. Total with charging case28 h vs 25 h+12%

Why is EAH-AZ80 better than Beocom EX UC?

  1. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  2. LDACNo · Beocom EX UC: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h7 h
Battery life with ANC6 h—
Total with charging case28 h25 h
Charging time1.5 h7 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Wireless charging (case)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.3
Bluetooth codecsaptX Adaptive, AAC, SBCLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXYesNo
LDACNoYes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)7 g7 g
Protection rating—IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx4
ColoursBlack—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare