vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
5.4Battery6.5
Why is Beocom EX UC better than LinkBuds S × Olivia Rodrigo WF-LS900N?
- aptXYes · LinkBuds S × Olivia Rodrigo WF-LS900N: No
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
Why is LinkBuds S × Olivia Rodrigo WF-LS900N better than Beocom EX UC?
- Battery life8 h vs 9 h+12%
- LDACNo · Beocom EX UC: Yes
- Earbud weight (each)7 g vs 4.8 g+46%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 5 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 9 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6 h | — |
| Total with charging case | 28 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC | LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7 g | 4.8 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Black | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
