Why is WS-Q1PNK better than ED-R20BT?
WS-Q1PNK has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is ED-R20BT better than WS-Q1PNK?
- Lowest frequency150 Hz vs 73 Hz2.1×
- StereoNo · WS-Q1PNK: Yes
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Output power | — | 5 W |
| Speaker channels | Mono | Stereo |
| Lowest frequency | 150 Hz | 73 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Stereo | No | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 20 h | — |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | — |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Battery powered (portable) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| LE Audio | Yes | — |
| Auracast | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| USB audio | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Width | — | 83 mm |
| Height | — | 177 mm |
| Depth | — | 121 mm |
| Protection rating | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 6 | — |
| Features | ||
| Party / stereo pairing | Yes | — |
| Light effects | — | Yes |
