Why is WA-Q1 better than WH-CH720N?
- Battery life55 h vs 50 h+10%
- Weight165 g vs 192 g+16%
- Charging time2 h vs 3.5 h+75%
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is WH-CH720N better than WA-Q1?
WH-CH720N has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 30 mm | 30 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 7 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 31 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 108 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 55 h | 50 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 32 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3.5 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 165 g | 192 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
