How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. WA-Q1 vs TAA4216BK/00

AVIOT WA-Q1 vs Philips TAA4216BK/00

What WA-Q1 does better (4) and where TAA4216BK/00 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

AVIOT WA-Q1
AVIOT · 2024WA-Q1
8.2Score
4 advantages≈ $50
Higher score
vs
Philips TAA4216BK/00
Philips · 2021TAA4216BK/00
6.0Score
1 advantage≈ $50
7.8Noise control & calls3.8
6.9Battery5.4

Why is WA-Q1 better than TAA4216BK/00?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · TAA4216BK/00: No
  2. Battery life55 h vs 35 h+57%
  3. Weight165 g vs 214 g+30%
  4. Bluetooth version5.4 vs 5+8%

Why is TAA4216BK/00 better than WA-Q1?

  1. Driver size30 mm vs 40 mm+33%
Specifications

Side by side

AVIOT WA-Q1AVIOT WA-Q1≈ $508.2
Sound
Fit—On-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size30 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—118 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life55 h35 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.45
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Weight165 g214 g
Protection rating—IP55
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
FoldableYesYes
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare