6.8Battery9.0
Why is WA-Q1 better than TUNE 530BT?
WA-Q1 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TUNE 530BT better than WA-Q1?
- Battery life55 h vs 76 h+38%
- Bluetooth version5.4 vs 6+11%
- Weight165 g vs 152 g+9%
- Driver size30 mm vs 33 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 30 mm | 33 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 30 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 102 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 55 h | 76 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 165 g | 152 g |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
