vs
7.8Noise control & calls9.2
6.9Battery7.1
Why is WA-Q1 better than Clam Junior?
WA-Q1 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Clam Junior better than WA-Q1?
- Battery life55 h vs 60 h+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 30 mm | — |
| Sensitivity | — | 85 dB |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 55 h | 60 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 40 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm jack / AUX | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 165 g | — |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
