vs
3.8Battery5.5
Why is TE-Z1PNK better than AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-A?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-A: No
- LDACYes · AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-A: No
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
Why is AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-A better than TE-Z1PNK?
- Battery life7 h vs 8 h+14%
- aptXNo · TE-Z1PNK: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | — |
| Driver type | Planar magnetic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | — | 22 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 17,500 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 17 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 107 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 8 h |
| Total with charging case | 18 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 21 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple AirPods Pro 2vsAVIOT TE-Z1PNK5.35.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsShure AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-A5.95.9
vsSoundcore Liberty Air 2 ProvsShure AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-A6.25.9vs
Shure AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-AvsTechnics EAH-AZ70W5.95.6
vsJabra Elite 85tvsShure AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-A6.05.9vs
Shure AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-AvsEarFun Free 2S