Why is TE-W2 better than RHOX LX?
- Battery life17 h vs 3 h5.7×
- Active noise cancellingYes · RHOX LX: No
- Total with charging case52 h vs 10 h5.2×
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · RHOX LX: No
- LDACYes · RHOX LX: No
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
- Driver size10 mm vs 8 mm+25%
Why is RHOX LX better than TE-W2?
RHOX LX has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 14 Ω |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 17 h | 3 h |
| Total with charging case | 52 h | 10 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 30 mAh |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
