vs
9.5Battery6.9
Why is TE-W2 better than AeroFit 2 AI Assistant?
- Battery life17 h vs 8.5 h2×
- Total with charging case52 h vs 35 h+49%
Why is AeroFit 2 AI Assistant better than TE-W2?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 1 h+50%
- Driver size10 mm vs 11.5 mm+15%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Open-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 11.5 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 17 h | 8.5 h |
| Total with charging case | 52 h | 35 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | LDAC, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | Yes |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 10 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Colours | — | Jet Black, Pearl White, Sage Green |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
AVIOT TE-W2vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörervs
AVIOT TE-W2vsSoundcore R50i NCvs
AVIOT TE-W2vsAVIOT TE-W19.68.2vs
AVIOT TE-W2vsDeWalt Heavy Duty True Wireless In-Ear Kopfhörer Bluetooth 37h IP56vs
AVIOT TE-W2vsBose Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-Earbuds
vs
JVC HA-A110TvsSoundcore AeroFit 2 AI Assistant8.18.2