vs
7.2Noise control & calls5.2
9.5Battery6.9
Why is TE-W2 better than AH-C840NCW?
- Battery life17 h vs 10 h+70%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · AH-C840NCW: No
- Total with charging case52 h vs 35 h+49%
- LDACYes · AH-C840NCW: No
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
Why is AH-C840NCW better than TE-W2?
- Driver size10 mm vs 12 mm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 12 mm |
| Spatial / 3D audio | Yes | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 2 |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 17 h | 10 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 52 h | 35 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 5 min → 1 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | LDAC, AAC, SBC | LC3, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | Yes | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 5 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
AVIOT TE-W2vsRick and Morty Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörervs
AVIOT TE-W2vsSoundcore R50i NCvs
AVIOT TE-W2vsAVIOT TE-W19.68.2vs
AVIOT TE-W2vsDeWalt Heavy Duty True Wireless In-Ear Kopfhörer Bluetooth 37h IP56vs
AVIOT TE-W2vsBose Kabelgebundene Noise-Cancelling-Earbuds
vs
Shokz OpenFit 2vsDenon AH-C840NCW6.66.7