How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TE-Q3R vs Flex Open Earbuds

AVIOT TE-Q3R vs JLab Flex Open Earbuds

What TE-Q3R does better (6) and where Flex Open Earbuds wins (1) — every spec side by side.

AVIOT TE-Q3R
AVIOT · 2025TE-Q3R
9.2Score
6 advantages≈ $60
Higher score
vs
JLab Flex Open Earbuds
JLab · 2025Flex Open Earbuds
5.2Score
1 advantage≈ $60
7.2Noise control & calls4.8
8.7Battery4.4

Why is TE-Q3R better than Flex Open Earbuds?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · Flex Open Earbuds: No
  2. Battery life11.5 h vs 7 h+64%
  3. Total with charging case42 h vs 21 h2×
  4. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · Flex Open Earbuds: No
  5. LDACYes · Flex Open Earbuds: No
  6. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is Flex Open Earbuds better than TE-Q3R?

  1. Driver size10 mm vs 12 mm+20%
Specifications

Side by side

AVIOT TE-Q3RAVIOT TE-Q3R≈ $609.2
Sound
FitIn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup design—Open-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm12 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—12 Ω
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—4
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life11.5 h7 h
Total with charging case42 h21 h
Battery capacity—70 mAh
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 1 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesNo
aptXNoNo
LDACYesNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Latency—200 ms
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight—49 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)—5
Colours—Black, Teal, White
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare