How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TE-Q3R vs Tune 255NC

AVIOT TE-Q3R vs JBL Tune 255NC

What TE-Q3R does better (1) and where Tune 255NC wins (2) — every spec side by side.

AVIOT TE-Q3R
AVIOT · 2025TE-Q3R
9.2Score
1 advantage≈ $60
Higher score
vs
JBL Tune 255NC
JBL · 2025Tune 255NC
8.0Score
2 advantages≈ $70
7.2Noise control & calls5.7
8.7Battery9.3

Why is TE-Q3R better than Tune 255NC?

  1. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is Tune 255NC better than TE-Q3R?

  1. Battery life11.5 h vs 12 h+4%
  2. Total with charging case42 h vs 48 h+14%
Specifications

Side by side

AVIOT TE-Q3RAVIOT TE-Q3R≈ $609.2
JBL Tune 255NCJBL Tune 255NC≈ $708.0
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size10 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—100 dB
Spatial / 3D audioYes—
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life11.5 h12 h
Battery life with ANC—12 h
Total with charging case42 h48 h
Battery capacity—65 mAh
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Wireless charging (case)Yes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXNo—
LDACYes—
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight—52 g
Protection ratingIPX4IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)—5
Colours—Black
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare