How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TE-Q3R vs OpenJump

AVIOT TE-Q3R vs EarFun OpenJump

What TE-Q3R does better (2) and where OpenJump wins (3) — every spec side by side.

AVIOT TE-Q3R
AVIOT · 2025TE-Q3R
9.2Score
2 advantages≈ $60
Higher score
vs
EarFun OpenJump
EarFun · 2025OpenJump
8.5Score
3 advantages≈ $60
7.2Noise control & calls4.8
8.7Battery8.8

Why is TE-Q3R better than OpenJump?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · OpenJump: No
  2. Battery life11.5 h vs 11 h+5%

Why is OpenJump better than TE-Q3R?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx7+75%
  2. Charging time1.5 h vs 1 h+50%
  3. Driver size10 mm vs 14.2 mm+42%
Specifications

Side by side

AVIOT TE-Q3RAVIOT TE-Q3R≈ $609.2
EarFun OpenJumpEarFun OpenJump≈ $608.5
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Open-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm14.2 mm
Spatial / 3D audioYesYes
Head tracking—Yes
Hi-Res AudioYesYes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—4
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life11.5 h11 h
Total with charging case42 h42 h
Battery capacity—60 mAh
Charging time1.5 h1 h
Wireless charging (case)YesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsLDAC, AAC, SBCLDAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)YesYes
aptXNoNo
LDACYesYes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—7.8 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX7
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx7
Colours—Black
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare