How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TE-Q3 vs tiny HP-T250BT

AVIOT TE-Q3 vs radius tiny HP-T250BT

What TE-Q3 does better (4) and where tiny HP-T250BT wins (2) — every spec side by side.

AVIOT TE-Q3
AVIOT · 2023TE-Q3
8.5Score
4 advantages≈ $45
vs
radius tiny HP-T250BT
radius · 2023tiny HP-T250BT
9.2Score
2 advantages≈ $40
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
9.1Battery7.7
6.0Build & features9.1

Why is TE-Q3 better than tiny HP-T250BT?

  1. Battery life11.5 h vs 10 h+15%
  2. Bluetooth version5.3 vs 5.1+4%
  3. Driver size10 mm vs 6 mm+67%
  4. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%

Why is tiny HP-T250BT better than TE-Q3?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
  2. Earbud weight (each)4.2 g vs 4 g+5%
Specifications

Side by side

AVIOT TE-Q3AVIOT TE-Q3≈ $458.5
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—97 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life11.5 h10 h
Total with charging case42 h—
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.1
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.2 g4 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare