How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TE-Q3 vs CMF Buds Pro 2

AVIOT TE-Q3 vs Nothing CMF Buds Pro 2

What TE-Q3 does better (1) and where CMF Buds Pro 2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

AVIOT TE-Q3
AVIOT · 2023TE-Q3
8.5Score
1 advantage≈ $45
vs
Nothing CMF Buds Pro 2
Nothing · 2024CMF Buds Pro 2
9.0Score
5 advantages≈ $45
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls8.3
9.1Battery8.2

Why is TE-Q3 better than CMF Buds Pro 2?

  1. Battery life11.5 h vs 11 h+5%

Why is CMF Buds Pro 2 better than TE-Q3?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · TE-Q3: Yes
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
  3. LDACNo · TE-Q3: Yes
  4. Total with charging case42 h vs 43 h+2%
  5. Driver size10 mm vs 11 mm+10%
Specifications

Side by side

AVIOT TE-Q3AVIOT TE-Q3≈ $458.5
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm11 mm
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—6
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life11.5 h11 h
Battery life with ANC—7 h
Total with charging case42 h43 h
Battery capacity—60 mAh
Charging time1.5 h—
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCLDAC, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoNo
LDACNoYes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYes—
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.2 g—
Protection ratingIPX4IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare