Why is TE-Q3-NA2 better than Sport X20?
- Charging time1.5 h vs 3 h2×
- Earbud weight (each)4.2 g vs 6.5 g+55%
Why is Sport X20 better than TE-Q3-NA2?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Battery life11.5 h vs 12 h+4%
- Total with charging case42 h vs 48 h+14%
- Driver size10 mm vs 11 mm+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 11 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 6 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 11.5 h | 12 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 42 h | 48 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 3 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.2 g | 6.5 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Colours | — | Black, White, Green |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
