vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
9.1Battery8.8
6.0Build & features9.4
Why is TE-Q3-NA2 better than Sesh ANC Active S2SAW-S749?
TE-Q3-NA2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Sesh ANC Active S2SAW-S749 better than TE-Q3-NA2?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx7+75%
- Battery life11.5 h vs 12 h+4%
- Driver size10 mm vs 12 mm+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 99 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 11.5 h | 12 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 7 h |
| Total with charging case | 42 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 56 g |
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.2 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP67 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 6 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
