How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TE-Q3-NA2 vs TONE Free DFP9E

AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2 vs LG TONE Free DFP9E

What TE-Q3-NA2 does better (3) and where TONE Free DFP9E wins (2) — every spec side by side.

AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2
AVIOT · 2023TE-Q3-NA2
8.5Score
3 advantages≈ $85
vs
LG TONE Free DFP9E
LG · 2022TONE Free DFP9E
8.6Score
2 advantages≈ $95
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls9.3
9.1Battery6.6

Why is TE-Q3-NA2 better than TONE Free DFP9E?

  1. Battery life11.5 h vs 10 h+15%
  2. Total with charging case42 h vs 24 h+75%
  3. Driver size10 mm vs 8 mm+25%

Why is TONE Free DFP9E better than TE-Q3-NA2?

  1. aptXNo · TE-Q3-NA2: Yes
  2. Charging time1.5 h vs 1 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2≈ $858.5
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm8 mm
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life11.5 h10 h
Battery life with ANC—6 h
Total with charging case42 h24 h
Battery capacity—68 mAh
Charging time1.5 h1 h
Quick charge (claimed)—5 min → 1 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.2
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCaptX, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoYes
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.2 g—
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare