How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TE-Q3-NA2 vs Tune Flex 2 Ghost Edition

AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2 vs JBL Tune Flex 2 Ghost Edition

What TE-Q3-NA2 does better (1) and where Tune Flex 2 Ghost Edition wins (2) — every spec side by side.

AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2
AVIOT · 2023TE-Q3-NA2
8.5Score
1 advantage≈ $85
vs
JBL Tune Flex 2 Ghost Edition
8.7Score
2 advantages≈ $75
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
9.1Battery7.8

Why is TE-Q3-NA2 better than Tune Flex 2 Ghost Edition?

  1. Total with charging case42 h vs 24 h+75%

Why is Tune Flex 2 Ghost Edition better than TE-Q3-NA2?

  1. Battery life11.5 h vs 12 h+4%
  2. Driver size10 mm vs 12 mm+20%
Specifications

Side by side

AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2≈ $858.5
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm12 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—13 Ω
Sensitivity—98 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life11.5 h12 h
Battery life with ANC—8 h
Total with charging case42 h24 h
Charging time1.5 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
Smart & streaming
Voice assistant—Google Assistant
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.2 g—
Protection ratingIPX4IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)—5
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare