How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TE-Q3-NA2 vs Live Buds 3

AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2 vs JBL Live Buds 3

What TE-Q3-NA2 does better (2) and where Live Buds 3 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2
AVIOT · 2023TE-Q3-NA2
8.5Score
2 advantages≈ $85
vs
JBL Live Buds 3
JBL · 2024Live Buds 3
9.2Score
1 advantage≈ $85
Higher score
7.2Noise control & calls8.3
9.1Battery8.4

Why is TE-Q3-NA2 better than Live Buds 3?

  1. Battery life11.5 h vs 10 h+15%
  2. Total with charging case42 h vs 40 h+5%

Why is Live Buds 3 better than TE-Q3-NA2?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2≈ $858.5
JBL Live Buds 3JBL Live Buds 3≈ $859.2
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—40,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—103 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Microphones—6
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life11.5 h10 h
Battery life with ANC—8 h
Total with charging case42 h40 h
Charging time1.5 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.2 g—
Protection ratingIPX4IP55
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Dust protection (IP)—5
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare