How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TE-Q3-NA2 vs Free Pro 3

AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2 vs EarFun Free Pro 3

What TE-Q3-NA2 does better (3) and where Free Pro 3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2
AVIOT · 2023TE-Q3-NA2
8.5Score
3 advantages≈ $85
Higher score
vs
EarFun Free Pro 3
EarFun · 2023Free Pro 3
8.1Score
3 advantages≈ $60
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
9.1Battery5.3
6.0Build & features8.1

Why is TE-Q3-NA2 better than Free Pro 3?

  1. Battery life11.5 h vs 7.5 h+53%
  2. Driver size10 mm vs 7 mm+43%
  3. Earbud weight (each)4.2 g vs 5 g+19%

Why is Free Pro 3 better than TE-Q3-NA2?

  1. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · TE-Q3-NA2: Yes
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
  3. aptXNo · TE-Q3-NA2: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2AVIOT TE-Q3-NA2≈ $858.5
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm7 mm
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life11.5 h7.5 h
Battery life with ANC—6 h
Total with charging case42 h—
Charging time1.5 h1.5 h
Wireless charging (case)—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCaptX Adaptive, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoYes
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4.2 g5 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare