vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
9.8Battery6.8
3.4Build & features8.6
Why is TE-D01v better than XX HA-XC72T?
- Battery life18 h vs 9 h2×
- Driver size10 mm vs 6 mm+67%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
Why is XX HA-XC72T better than TE-D01v?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- Earbud weight (each)6.3 g vs 4.6 g+37%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 18 h | 9 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 7.5 h |
| Total with charging case | 60 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6.3 g | 4.6 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IP55 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
