Why is TE-D01m2 better than WF-C500?
- Active noise cancellingYes · WF-C500: No
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · WF-C500: No
- Charging time1.5 h vs 3 h2×
- aptXYes · WF-C500: No
- Driver size10 mm vs 5.8 mm+72%
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is WF-C500 better than TE-D01m2?
- Earbud weight (each)6.5 g vs 5.4 g+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 5.8 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 10 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 20 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 3 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6.5 g | 5.4 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
