Why is TE-D01i2 better than Air Pro 4?
TE-D01i2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Air Pro 4 better than TE-D01i2?
- Battery life9 h vs 11 h+22%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · TE-D01i2: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
- LDACNo · TE-D01i2: Yes
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5.4+4%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 1 h+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 40,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Adaptive ANC | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Microphones | — | 6 |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 11 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 7.5 h |
| Total with charging case | — | 52 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 54 mAh |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 1 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | LDAC, aptX Lossless, aptX |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | Yes | Yes |
| LDAC | No | Yes |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| LE Audio | — | Yes |
| Auracast | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Latency | — | 50 ms |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | — | 5.2 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Wear detection (auto pause) | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
