vs
5.6Battery5.0
Why is TE-D01i better than COPENHAGEN?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- aptXYes · COPENHAGEN: No
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
Why is COPENHAGEN better than TE-D01i?
- Driver size6 mm vs 12 mm2×
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | Semi-in-ear (open) |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 90 dB | 115 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 8 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6.1 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
