vs
7.6Battery2.2
Why is Openpiece M TE-M1 better than QCY-HT01C?
- Battery life10.5 h vs 5 h2.1×
- Driver size10 mm vs 7 mm+43%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
- Earbud weight (each)4.6 g vs 5.2 g+13%
Why is QCY-HT01C better than Openpiece M TE-M1?
QCY-HT01C has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Open-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 7 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10.5 h | 5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 4 h |
| Total with charging case | 29 h | — |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.6 g | 5.2 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
